Request a reviewed editorial profile and practical recommendations for repository documentation and GitHub Pages visibility.
Use the form to share a public GitHub repository, a short description, and an authorized contact. Submission is free and non-binding; publication only follows editorial review and a separate agreement.
The planned entry includes an independent editorial profile and a review of publicly visible repository and GitHub Pages information with SEO/GEO recommendations. Applicable taxes and final terms are clarified before work begins.
Clear documentation and relevant internal links can improve the conditions for discovery. A Google position, GitHub ranking, or AI mention cannot be promised.
No. The public repository is enough for an editorial review. If you have a project website or GitHub Pages site, its page structure and user-facing explanations can be included.
Owners, maintainers, and people authorized by the project can submit. Submission does not make any repository change and does not create automatic publication.
No. The same published score method applies to every project. An entry does not purchase points, a recommendation, or a preferred score.
A clear README, a specific use case, understandable installation steps, and license information are useful. Missing facts are identified as gaps, not invented.
The form starts an inquiry only. Publication requires editorial review and a separate agreement; no payment is taken through this form.
Yes, where a public site exists, the review can cover page titles, user questions, internal links, and documentation clarity. It does not promise a search ranking or AI citation.
Send public repository and business contact information only. Do not send private code, access tokens, passwords, customer data, or other confidential material.